
| |
|
e-gov.br
Chapter 3
Eletronic Government: Suggestions for the Future
Electronic government is much more than computerized
government. It is an open and adaptable government to better meet society’s
needs. It should use information and communication technologies to broaden
citizenship, increase the transparency of management and the participation
of citizens in monitoring of government, and to democratize access to
information technologies.
The priority for Brazilian governments at all levels of the
federation is to put all public services online, except those which require
face-to-face personal contact. Furthermore, these services should be
integrated at the national level through the Internet. Another essential
element to create a financing mechanism for electronic government at the
lowest level of the federation, the municípios (something between
counties and cities), never losing sight of the fact that this program will
certainly have to include elements to promote digital inclusion (bridging
the digital divide).
Digital inclusion has come to be the war on poverty in the
information age. It can help reverse the mechanisms which perpetuate misery
and open prospects of employment for millions of youth and adults. But it is
not a solution for all social problems. With it, we will be in a position to
compete in the global economy. Without it, we will not have a chance of
competing and bettering the lives of our people. Information is a basic
economic and social resource. Its production, storage and processing are
products which add value. By fighting double illiteracy, functional and
digital, it will be possible to create better jobs. Digital inclusion is one
of the levers to promote economic growth and which should be integrated into
a fundamental change in course: the resumption of economic development with
better income distribution and social justice.
The Presient Lula’s Government Program sets goals in the
area of information technology and explains clearly why this is an important
area:
Information technology is the great phenomenon of the end of the
twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first. With the
dissemination of computers, the Internet and mobile communication, societies
gain powerful tools for spreading knowledge to the masses and for increasing
productivity of nations, of their industries, of their services and more
broadly of all economic and cultural activity. The challenge, in the
information age, is to prevent information technology from creating divide
between those who have, and those that do not have access to the goods and
skills required in the digital era.
More than ever, sectoral
policies should e integrated so that we take advantage of the synergy and
productivity gains in meeting social demands. We have an historic
opportunity to take advantage of the technological convergence in the
digitalization of voice, image and data.
To explain the benefits that the use of information technology brings to
different governmental sectors, the Government Program proposes three
principal lines for orienting the information management:
·
Management
and governability.
To promote horizontal and vertical integration of government structures and
coordination and monitoring of their actions.
·
Electronic
Government. To
stimulate the broadest delivery of quality services and information to
citizens.
·
Democratization of access to information technologies. To encourage the creation of mechanisms and policies that permit
learning, access and massive incorporation of information technologies, and
that enable the sharing of solutions between different levels of government.
Our suggestions are intended to promote the achievement of
these objectives, which we consider appropriate not only for the Federal
Government, but also for the states and municípios in the economic,
political and social context
Brazil faces. Therefore we
propose principles which can guide the actions of Brazilian governments.
Then we proceed to suggest priority lines of action.
Principles
The principles we propose should serve as beacons to guide
actions when intense work and inevitable conflicts could make us loose our
strategic direction in the smoke and noise of daily battles. The principles
have a temporal and logical sequence..
Study national and international experience
They say that those who don’t study history are condemned to
repeat it. A government can learn much from the experiences of other
countries as well as of the federal, state, and local governments in
Brazil. As our analysis
shows, there are cases of undeniable success and also of partial and total
failures.
At the federal level there are many examples. But the
experiences of the leading state e-governments – like Paraná,
Rio de Janeiro, Bahia, São
Paulo, and Rio Grande do Sul – are worth study. At the municipal level,
interesting experience has accumulated in Porto Alegre, Santo André, São
Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Ipatinga, and Victoria, among many others.
Brazil can aspire to enter
into the first world in the field of electronic government. The experience
of large developed countries with federal structures, such as Australia,
Canada, Germany and the United States (all above Brazil in the benchmarking
studies of the United Nations and Accenture[i])
suggests models which can serve as goals in the medium and long terms, once
studied from a Brazilian perspective.
There are also some emerging countries with electronic
governments which warrant study; this is the case for
South Africa, Chile,
Israel, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore. It should be
emphasized that no relevant experience, from whatever country, should be
excluded: Brazil is so diverse that even in the experience of much poorer
countries there are parallels that can be established with regard to some
Brazilian regions.
Two works dedicated to problems of e-government in developing
Countries – that of the Center for democracy and Technology and the InfoDev
Program of the World Bank (2002) and of the Working Group for e-Government
in the Developing World of the Pacific Council for International Policy
(2002) – are especially interesting sources and offer many lessons derived
from a large number of national experiences. Brazilian specialists
participated in both these studies.
Develop strategy and priorities
Since resources are finite and scarce, we have to define a
strategy that, without losing flexibility and creativity, helps in making
tough decisions. The demand for resources will always be greater than the
supply. A well-designed strategy, attuned to the priority objectives of the
government in other areas, facilitates choices as well as helping set
priorities for the general objectives of e-government. We suggest some
priorities, but the final selection should be made thorough a participatory
process organized by the government, perhaps in the contest of the Executive
Committee for Electronic Government.
Create new programs
Creativity is a characteristic of the Brazilian people. After
studying national and international experiences, gaps or failures in
existing programs will be visible as well as possibilities for creating new
alliances, designing new programs, or perfecting existing ones. It is worth
while remembering how important incentives are for mobilizing more resources
and ideas – above all positive incentives, such as financial resources, and
human ones such as professional recognition.
Start new programs with pilot projects
Because of the lack of resources, new programs and projects
should not receive large amounts of resources without previously being
tested and evaluated in pilot projects. After the tests, it is necessary to
broaden the scope of pilot projects, thus a rule of e-government is “Think
big, start small, scale rapidly”.
Join forces with successful programs
In
Brazil, as in many other countries, there is a tendency to create new
projects and programs even when others already exist, but organized by other
governments, institutions, or the private or third sectors. A national
strategy should sum forces and build on strengths, that is take advantage of
what works well, integrating it into a broader strategy. Recognizing the
success of others is a way to adapt it to the national strategy without
having to reinvent the wheel or test new projects and programs. In this way
effort and resources can be saved for areas in which there are no existing
programs, but which fall within general government priorities. This
principle can be applied to state and municipal projects and programs as
well as federal ones, or those of NGOs and the private sector.
Integrate horizontally and vertically
Our suggestions are intended to promote the achievement of
these objectives, which we consider appropriate not only for the Federal
Government, but also for the states and municípios in the economic,
political and social context
Brazil faces. Therefore we
propose principles which can guide the actions of Brazilian governments.
Then we proceed to suggest priority lines of action.
Principles
The principles we propose should serve as beacons to guide
actions when intense work and inevitable conflicts could make us loose our
strategic direction in the smoke and noise of daily battles. The
principles have a temporal and logical sequence.
Study national and international experience
They say that those who don’t study history are condemned to
repeat it. A government can learn much from the experiences of other
countries as well as of the federal, state, and local governments in
Brazil. As our analysis
shows, there are cases of undeniable success and also of partial and total
failures.
At the federal level there are many examples. But the
experiences of the leading state e-governments – like Paraná,
Rio de Janeiro, Bahia, São
Paulo, and Rio Grande do Sul – are worth study. At the municipal level,
interesting experience has accumulated in Porto Alegre, Santo André, São
Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Ipatinga, and Victoria, among many others.
Brazil can aspire to enter
into the first world in the field of electronic government. The experience
of large developed countries with federal structures, such as Australia,
Canada, Germany and the United States (all above Brazil in the benchmarking
studies of the United Nations and Accenture[i])
suggests models which can serve as goals in the medium and long terms, once
studied from a Brazilian perspective.
There are also some emerging countries with electronic
governments which warrant study; this is the case for
South Africa, Chile,
Israel, Malaysia, the Republic of Korea, and Singapore. It should be
emphasized that no relevant experience, from whatever country, should be
excluded: Brazil is so diverse that even in the experience of much poorer
countries there are parallels that can be established with regard to some
Brazilian regions.
Two works dedicated to problems of e-government in developing
Countries – that of the Center for democracy and Technology and the InfoDev
Program of the World Bank (2002) and of the Working Group for e-Government
in the Developing World of the Pacific Council for International Policy
(2002) – are especially interesting sources and offer many lessons derived
from a large number of national experiences. Brazilian specialists
participated in both these studies.
Develop strategy and priorities
Since resources are finite and scarce, we have to define a
strategy that, without losing flexibility and creativity, helps in making
tough decisions. The demand for resources will always be greater than the
supply. A well-designed strategy, attuned to the priority objectives of the
government in other areas, facilitates choices as well as helping set
priorities for the general objectives of e-government. We suggest some
priorities, but the final selection should be made thorough a participatory
process organized by the government, perhaps in the contest of the Executive
Committee for Electronic Government.
Create new programs
Creativity is a characteristic of the Brazilian people. After
studying national and international experiences, gaps or failures in
existing programs will be visible as well as possibilities for creating new
alliances, designing new programs, or perfecting existing ones. It is worth
while remembering how important incentives are for mobilizing more resources
and ideas – above all positive incentives, such as financial resources, and
human ones such as professional recognition.
Start new programs with pilot projects
Because of the lack of resources, new programs and projects
should not receive large amounts of resources without previously being
tested and evaluated in pilot projects. After the tests, it is necessary to
broaden the scope of pilot projects, thus a rule of e-government is “Think
big, start small, scale rapidly”.
Join forces with successful programs
In
Brazil, as in many other countries, there is a tendency to create new
projects and programs even when others already exist, but organized by other
governments, institutions, or the private or third sectors. A national
strategy should sum forces and build on strengths, that is take advantage of
what works well, integrating it into a broader strategy. Recognizing the
success of others is a way to adapt it to the national strategy without
having to reinvent the wheel or test new projects and programs. In this way
effort and resources can be saved for areas in which there are no existing
programs, but which fall within general government priorities. This
principle can be applied to state and municipal projects and programs as
well as federal ones, or those of NGOs and the private sector.
Integrate horizontally and vertically
Isolated projects and programs do not have the same potential
as those which integrate the actions of various agencies at one level of the
federation – we call this horizontal integration – or, and this is more
difficult but often meets the needs of citizens, that integrate the action
of agencies at the municipal, state and or federal level – vertical
integration. Well executed, such integration in the virtual world can lead
to public administration reform because it reveals the overlapping
requirements of different agencies, unnecessary expenditures of resources,
and lack of respect for citizens.
Integrating processes in public administration is a difficult
task because there are both political and technological challenges to
confront. Even when preparation for such integration can be accomplished at
the technical level, making integrated processes viable depends on
negotiations at the strategic level, political circumstances, and the
relative strength of the actors involved.
An example of desirable horizontal and vertical integration
is the process for establishing a new business. It is a bureaucratic
nightmare – lawyers and agents run between agencies of the município,
the state and the federal government.[ii]
A citizen doesn’t care whether the agencies with which she has to deal are
municipal, state, or federal. As two Brazilian specialists explain, the
ideal for an integrated e-government is the following:
In dealing with government,
citizens or businesses do not need to go to innumerable different agencies
to get something done, such as getting married or divorced, opening a
business, or obtaining a license for whatever. It is possible to resolve
everything in one place, with one password. The user doesn’t need to know
what agencies or departments are mobilized to provide a given service or
supply certain information. What goes on behind the electronic interface
is of no interest to him.[iii]
Isolated projects and programs do not have the same potential
as those which integrate the actions of various agencies at one level of the
federation – we call this horizontal integration – or, and this is more
difficult but often meets the needs of citizens, that integrate the action
of agencies at the municipal, state and or federal level – vertical
integration. Well executed, such integration in the virtual world can lead
to public administration reform because it reveals the overlapping
requirements of different agencies, unnecessary expenditures of resources,
and lack of respect for citizens.
Integrating processes in public administration is a difficult
task because there are both political and technological challenges to
confront. Even when preparation for such integration can be accomplished at
the technical level, making integrated processes viable depends on
negotiations at the strategic level, political circumstances, and the
relative strength of the actors involved.
An example of desirable horizontal and vertical integration
is the process for establishing a new business. It is a bureaucratic
nightmare – lawyers and agents run between agencies of the município,
the state and the federal government.[ii]
A citizen doesn’t care whether the agencies with which she has to deal are
municipal, state, or federal. As two Brazilian specialists explain, the
ideal for an integrated e-government is the following:
In dealing with government,
citizens or businesses do not need to go to innumerable different agencies
to get something done, such as getting married or divorced, opening a
business, or obtaining a license for whatever. It is possible to resolve
everything in one place, with one password. The user doesn’t need to know
what agencies or departments are mobilized to provide a given service or
supply certain information. What goes on behind the electronic interface
is of no interest to him.[iii]
G2G – Government Intranets
A form of integration is within the state machinery, in which
electronic government can streamline the internal government functions, such
as an electronic database on federal civil servants, carried out by Siorg,
the Organizational Information System of the Federal Government (see
www.siorg.redegoverno.gov.br). Part of the information is made available
for the public (G2C), the rest is restricted to use within the government
(G2G).
G2B
– Extranet with suppliers and investors
This type of integration unites government agencies with
suppliers and/or private investors or other organizations. It allows
e-procurement, making payments or paying fees and taxes, exchanging
information, etc.
The existence of an electronic relationship with the
government can be a favorable factor in attracting firms that have automated
business processes. The lack of such a relationship will be unfavorable when
the supply of electronic services is generalized between states and
municípios.
G2C – Personalized Internet
for citizens
This is the new interface between the citizen and his/her
governments. An example is the main federal government portal (www.e.gov.br),
which allows access to a wide range of government services, from simple
information to individualized financial transactions, such as the payment of
taxes. The portal offers limited integration with state and municipal
governments, that is, access is provided without a true vertical integration
in the provision of services. The low-risk practice is to automate the
provision of an existing service, common in almost all e-government
projects, which brings lesser gains. Nevertheless, if a public
administration succeeds in orienting service provision in the eyes of the
user – whether a citizen or a legal entity such as a firm – the gains will
certainly be greater. But this redesign will encounter challenges of
integration at the political and technical levels.
It is necessary to develop portals, for they are a new
channel for delivering public services and information, but also two-way
communication between government and society.[iv]
Governments are going to offer public services with interagency integrated
processes, using the Web or by traditional means of delivering public
services supported by technology. Governments can do it proactively, in
order to provide better services and information to society, or reactively,
responding to the demands of society to operate within the new paradigm for
service delivery being established by the private sector.
Portal development is generating gains which are perceived by
users in timely delivery, quality, and time-saving by avoiding the need to
physically visit different government agencies. For government there are
gains in greater transparency, lower costs, and increased capacity to meet
demand.
“Thematic” portals can be developed, and there is the
possibility of the user of building her own, personal portal. There are
profiles of different users. Still to be developed could be a government
page which could be standard for any desired service, with the advantage of
increasing the audience at a single website, similarly the commercial or
political exploitation of this audience. Alternatively, different Web
interfaces could be provided, designed to fit the citizen’s, professional’s,
or busines’ usage patterns in dealing with the government. Thus it is
possible to build portals “on demand” for each user group’s needs for
consultation government databases and for each usage profile for delivering
services which the government provides. Such portals are points of entry for
the network, and technology allows mass customization. It is possible to
build a generic portal and specific ones for different user groups. At the
limit, each citizen can be allowed to personalize her interface with
government. Specific examples would be a portal for business people, with
economic indicators, news, business opportunities, links of interest, offers
for training workers, incentives, the possibility of receiving offers of
potential employees; a “student” portal, with enrolments, educational
history, available positions in public and private education and training
institutions, government programs, competitions, libraries, offers of
internships, and interesting links; a “workers’ portal” with economic
indicators, legislation, issuing of work cards, and again interesting links.
If all had the same search engine for selecting from a universe of available
information and services, different views of the same government could be
constructed. The number of users of each portal will be reduced, but there
will be a gain in the homogenization of the user profiles. The building of
thematic portals based on government services can also be outsourced to
private organizations.
Collectivize Internet access
Digital exclusion must be fought by an active policy of
digital inclusion. Where distance or income do not allow access to the
Internet and e-government from the citizen’s home, it is necessary to
collectivize access through telecenters, infocenters, public libraries,
schools, etc. A wide range of organizational forms is available to adapt to
the technological and socal conditions of each location, of each community.
Such collective access centers can be maintained directly by governments
(municipal, state, or federal); indirectly, with subsidies from these
governments to community organizations or NGOs; or by the private sector
(Internet cafés or cabinas can already be seen in many Brazilian
cities and towns). The creation of private telecenters can be en encouraged
through tax incentives, or even through reverse auctions, where the firm
offering to deliver a specific list of services at the lowest cost, in
conditions established by governments, wins the subsidy and becomes subject
to monitoring by the populace and by the State.
More experimentation and even healthy competition is
desirable, not only between various organizational forms, but also among
technologies. For example, there are various broadband technologies – via
coaxial cable, via conventional telephone lines (DSL, ADSL), via fiber optic
cable, via electric power lines (PLC), even via satellite in more remote
regions, especially in the Amazon and rural areas of the Northeast and
Center West. Which of these technologies can offer the lowest prices in each
location? How can healthy competition be encouraged? And, for new models of
collective access, the government can encourage competition with prizes for
the best solutions. From each experience there should be an effort to learn
something through a systematic evaluation.
The knowledge available from telecenters of various types in
Brazil and various parts of the world, from
Canada, with 8,800
community access points, to
South Africa.
NGOs like sampa.org (www.sampa.org),[v]
the Committee for the Democratization of Information Technology (www.cdi.org.br)[vi]
and Rits, the Information Network of the Third Sector (www.rits.org.br)
have engaged in partnerships with governments to operate telecenters.
Ideally, telecenters should progress toward models of
sustainability, charging small fees for their services, mobilizing
volunteers and training them. The financial resources should come from
multiple non-governmental sources; governmental resources should be used to
establish new telecenters, which later are weaned from State support.
Democratize content and access
Electronic democracy demands real democracy, that is popular
participation. From the outset, citizens need to know that information and
services are available. In telecenters content of interest to each locality
can be developed. Talent can be developed quickly, especially among youth,
as long as there is adequate organization. There are already examples – like
the telecentros in the muncípio of
São Paulo and the
infocentros of
São Paulo’s
state government that participate in the Access São Paulo program.
Democratization of access is essentially another name for
capilarization, or reaching the grass roots. Public policy should be
concerned with access for persons having their first contact with the
Internet and/or with different levels of literacy or with special needs, as
in the case of people with various kinds of deficiencies (blind, deaf, dumb,
crippled, etc.). They can return to the public the gains obtained with
installing Web-based services. Although there are few attempts to measure
such gains, there is a perception that providing such services brings a
reduction in operating costs. If this is confirmed, the gain obtained is
democratized, with better service quality. Investments in telephone call
centers (0-800 services), mobile posts, and computer centers in schools are
among the ways to democratize access to public services.[vii]
Reform public administration[viii]
We already touched on the matter of administrative reform
when we discussed the principal of horizontal and vertical integration. The
e-government portal is the departure point, but alone it is not enough. The
ideal portal individualizes the citizen’s relationship with his governments.
It matters little to the citizen whether the service she requires is
provided by this or that agency, secretariat, or ministry. She wants her
needs met, without wasting time in lines, with out having to hire an agent (despachante),
with courtesy, and punctually.
To register a birth, register a child in a school, report a
crime or that there is a pothole in the street, calculate and pay taxes,
obtain a building license, pay a fine, search for employment, register a
marriage, report a change of home or business address or telephone number,
retire – all are normal events in a citizen’s life cycle. It should not be
necessary to go to a municipal, state or federal government office, or even
to know how they are organized. The government can – and should – facilitate
the life of the citizen, treating him as a client or, better, as an
employer, and not as a number, a person whose time has no value, as an
object for which difficulties are created in order to obtain bribes for
relief from those very difficulties.
Various states have been providing new kinds of “one-stop
shop”. In Bahia they
are called “Services for Assisting Citizens” (SACs), in São Paulo
“Timesavers” (Poupatempos), in Rio de Janeiro Easy Rio (Rio Fácil),
in Curitiba
“Citizenship Streets”. They are located in shopping centers, at nodes of the
local transportation system, etc., that is in places convenient for the
citizen, and they operate on schedules which are not traditional for public
services, but convenient for the citizen. All government services are
available in these centers, so it is not necessary to walk from one
government agency to another losing both time and patience.
Electronic government open 24 hours a day on the Internet is
a natural extension of this type of administrative reform, a reform which
tends to lead governments organizing it to rethink their internal
organizations with a view to making them more efficient. The ideal portal
provides access to all levels of the Federation and does not expect the
citizen to be a political scientist in order to understand where he has to
go; the portal organizes services to meet the needs of those needing these
services, whether citizens or businesses.
Establishing an e-government portal can lead to additional
administrative reforms, eliminating duplication of services, reducing
unnecessary staff, creating new business processes, and the encouraging
better coordination of services from the three levels of the Federation. If
the intention is indeed to reform, reform can be realized in a systematic
yet context-sensitive way, taking into account the environment, the
components of a solution, the conditions which must be met, the stakeholders
involved, and both the theory and practice of the government in question.
Alternatively, it is possible to automate services along more traditional
lines. The first way allows more radical and effective changes in the
relationship between citizen and government. The second is more pragmatic,
and can be used in situations where government structures do not perceive
information and communication technologies’ potential to leverage government
actions. Nevertheless, changes can be brought about. Even when processes are
not redesigned, installing an electronic relationship leads to changes in
organization, processes, skills required, structures, and theories. A
well-designed change project, which considers all the factors, can leverage
public administration reform.
When these reforms are implemented, citizens and enterprises
will save a lot of money, since the costs of dealing with their governments
fall and taxes can decline. Below we give some examples of the kinds of
reforms which seek to break down self-contained “silos”, which seek
efficiency and efficacy, and which increase transparency, which in turn
reduces opportunities for corruption.
Break down silos and
intermediation
The tendency of bureaucracies, both public and private, is to
organize in self-contained departments, or “silos” (to use a term from
agriculture). In each silo there is a hierarchy with bureaucratic rules for
communication. The corporate interests of the bureaucrats tend to prevail
over the interests of citizens, with negative results for the latter. And,
when possible, the bureaucrats of one silo do not speak or even interact
with those from other silos (read ministries, agencies, seceretariats,
etc.). This corporativist organization is the legacy of the old Portuguese
estado cartorial and Mussolini’s
Corporativist State, copied
by Getúlio Vargas. This principle extends to separate “unions” (sindicatos)
for workers and employers, all subordinated to their respective ministries.
In this respect some changes in Brazilian public
organizations are already evident – new, more flexible policies, and people
disposed to a more entrepreneurial approach support a change process. But
breaking down silos is still necessary for democratic administrative
reform.
Governments can use technology to promote disintermediation
in the relationship between government and citizens and between government
and businesses. A more direct relationship is possible, without
intermediaries. For this, service-delivery processes have to be designed and
integrated, or there is a risk of perpetuating outdated processes. Some
intermediation processes exist because of the complexity of bureaucratic
processes and add value by saving time for the person or entity seeking the
service. But often they are opportunities to practice corruption.
The State has to organize itself to deliver services to
citizens, not for the advantage of the bureaucrats in their hierarchical
silos or for the intermediaries who live in symbiosis with the bureaucrats.
Electronic government changes the interface between the State and the
citizen, and this can lead to reform in the structures which sustain the
interface.
Seek efficiency and efficacy
Electronic government makes it possible to attain objectives
such as doing more and doing it more cheaply, rapidly, and better – in other
words, the possibility of getting more results at the same or less cost, in
less time, and with a higher standard of quality. Electronic government
offers the possibility, thus, for the government to offer new services or
conduct reforms which would otherwise be impossible to carry out. In
redesigning functions to correspond to the new interface, the Internet, many
ways of saving resources can be discovered. Transactions costs, execution
time, duplication and possibilities for errors in data are reduced; tasks
are transferred to the citizen, increasing the ability of the government to
deliver services; work flows are automated and internal processes
simplified. Furthermore the implementation of processes and mechanisms which
offer civil servants the possibility of innovating and being more effective
is made possible.
Increase transparency and attack corruption
Electronic government allows citizens, civil society
organizations, and even supervisory government agencies access to
information on the working of governments. The citizens and these
organizations can then oversee and monitor government offices and agencies.
Online purchases through reverse auctions (the lowest price wins), online
filing and payment of taxes, and monitoring the progress of public works are
only some examples of how transparency can facilitate citizen understanding
and avoid corruption. It shines the light of popular monitoring not only on
the activities of the State, but also of its bureaucrats and employees, who
then really do have to serve the people.
Listen to the Citizen
Listening to the citizen means being prepared to hear what
she has to say, but also to open lines of communication. Ombudsmen already
exist in many governments and government agencies, but it is necessary to
establish policies which guarantee confidentiality, obligatory replies, and
monitoring of the quality of these replies.
For beyond complaints and reports, the citizen also has to be
heard regarding the choice of priorities in making services available. Even
those who never used a computer have expectations regarding the use of
technology by government to better meet the needs of the population.
Public consultations, surveys, and referendums are other
possibilities for listening to the citizen. And finally, we can go beyond a
government which asks “speak with us, we reply” with participation in both
formulating and monitoring the execution of public policies and budgets. It
should be kept in mind that the Internet facilitates democratic practice and
that this depends more on the existing mechanisms of participation than on
technology. Technology is available, but its use depends on political will
on the part of the government, and a interest in playing an active role on
the part of citizens. The Web is an alternative for governments whose action
plan includes increasing democratic participation.
Involve the stakeholders
Stakeholders are the persons and/or organizations that have
an interest in a given matter. Involving them is good policy, good
administration, and good governance. However inspired civil servants,
managers, and political leaders charged with elaborating e-government policy
may be, they are not omniscient. It is important to involve organizations
and those responsible for implementing e-government policy with its users.
This is the way to discover and overcome resistance, creating win-win
conditions and understanding the needs of users (See Box 3.1).
Users can be involved through intermediation by political
representatives with roots in communities, civil society organizations, or
directly through setting up focus groups, a technique often used in
strategic communication and in marketing of products and services produced
by the private sector as well as of political candidates or policies that a
government is considering for implementation. It is a kind of field test
with the support of social scientists (psychologists, anthropologists,
communications specialists). When this technique is not appropriate, a pilot
project can be a solution.
|
Box 3.1: Does the citizen have something to say?
The sucesss of an e-government program depends on a
significant advance in digital inclusion. And why not think of
e-government from the point of view of the excluded? Could it be that
the digitally excluded, about 90% of the Brazilian population, has
expectations regarding the use of information technology by the
government?
An exploratory study on
this matter was undertaken by the masters program in administration of
the Pontifical Catholic University of Parana (PUC-PR).[ix]
At the end of 2002, 297 participants in a government digital inclusion
program in the municípios of Mandaguarí, Mandaguaçu and Sarandi,
located in the northern region of Paraná about 300 miles from the state
capital, Curitiba, were interviewed. Although they had never had contact
with a computer, 84.7% of those interviewed spontaneously presented
clear expectations concerning the use of information technology by the
government. Among them, 44.3% hoped for actions that would train them
for the labor market; 15.8% that technology would improve government
actions in the health area (“We go there [to the health post] and they
[the doctors] don’t even know whether the medicine has run out or what
we should take now); 11.6% that information technology helps in reducing
misery, since the few actions that exist in this area are little
controlled (“Things go to those who don’t really need them”). The fourth
priority was education: 10.5% noted the need to use technology in the
schools from the beginning of a student’s schooling.
Another aspect
investigated was the perception of priority that the participants had
regarding the three pillars normally found in e-government programs:
services for citizens, governance, and e-democracy. For 50%, governance
was the priority, so that government would be internally more efficient
and more effective in formulating and implementing public policies. For
another 47.8%, the priority should be to use technology to improve the
delivery of services to the citizen. Only 2.2% thought the item
e-democracy was the most important. As for the question involving
citizenship and participation, the interviewees believe that “since
other forms exist, it does not depend on the computer, it’s just use
them”, or that “the computer can help, but there area already other
forms and it (the government) already has a lot of information. Et uses
information more to collect taxes rather than to do something”.
Comparing the expectations which they had with the
functionality already implemented in the most visible part of
e-government programs – service portals on the Internet – the challenge
is enormous regarding understanding the expectations of the digitally
excluded and meeting them. Listening to them and taking actions in view
of their priorities could realign public informatics. |
The objective is not only to discover resistances and
overcome them and to design services that achieve their objectives, but also
to save political, financial and human resources, avoiding the allocation of
large quantities of resources until the service is shown to be feasible and
efficient to deliver. It can take more time to involve the stakeholders than
to imply impose or execute a policy, but the results are better in various
dimensions: in the coherence of policy, in the ease of its implementation,
in its financial cost, and in its effectiveness.
Create Alliances
A basic principle of politics, one frequently forgotten by
politicians and economists, is that, to achieve a change objective that will
affect vested interests, it is advisable to form alliances with groups that,
in the end, will be benefited by the change, or that can be led to support
it thorough an exchange of favors or by the threat of withdrawing support
for objectives which are important to these groups. The implementation of
e-government implies reforms of the State, of public administration, and of
the manner in which citizens and businesses interact with the state.
The process for involving stakeholders seeks to create
alliances, or, at least, to reduce resistances. But it is worthwhile to
think politically and seek active alliances within the federal government
and with state and municipal governments, with the private sector, and with
the third sector (civil society organizations including NGOs). Where there
is obstinate resistance, it should be neutralized. Developing a winning
alliance or coalition is a form of neutralizing the opposition and the
activity of intermediaries.
Communicate strategically with the public
Strategic communication, a modern term for scientific
marketing, also helps promote desirable changes for the implementation of
electronic democracy. In the private sector it is not rare to invest heavily
in marketing studies, focus groups, and in advertising. The same thing takes
place in political campaigns. And why shouldn’t reformers use these tools to
achieve objectives declared during a political campaign after the
politicians who proposed them have been elected? A multimedia approach, with
synergy among its components – that is combined use of the Internet,
television, radio, the print press, and face-to-face events like seminars,
presentations, and speeches is best. Specifically these techniques can be
used to promote the use of government service portals to develop their
audience just as is done with commercial portals: it is a way to promote
services and their adoption.
Internet
On the Internet, governments can use their service portals or
specialized e-government sites to announce their objectives, events, etc.
But a communications policy appropriate to this medium, with allocation of
formal responsibility of content and updating of pages should be developed.
On the sites of government agencies that have priority participation in the
program (ministries, secretariats and data processing services) items of
special interest can be inserted. It is also possible to use more active
techniques, like automatic distribution lists for e-mailed notices,
electronic discussion groups, and electronic forums.
Television
Television, the most popular Brazilian medium, is available
in almost 90 percent of households. It is also a powerful communications
tool; the formats which can be used include interviews, news programs (to
announce an important event or success achieved), documentaries, and even
telenovelas (dramatic serials – that can, for example, portray
interactions between citizens and governments via the Internet, distance
education – showing a youth progressing in his career through taking
advantage of this, persons solving health programs on the Internet, the use
of information and communication technologies in public safety, businesses
carrying out business with governments, etc.).
Radio
Everything we write with regard to television also applies to
radio, an extremely popular medium in many regions of
Brazil. Though it is less
powerful (offering sound, but no images), radio reaches people in their
cars, at work, on the beach and in other places where television is not
normally present.
Print media
A powerful medium, which can be sued to complement the
others, newspapers, magazines and the like daily r3each millions of
Brazilians at home or the workplace, and can be read on the bus, in the
metro, on airplanes, etc. An article, column, an interview, a paid
announcement – these are some of the formats for the print media.
Speeches, presentations,
and seminars
These are events which
attract a limited, but usually influential audience. When they are important
and given appropriate publicity, they can receive coverage on television,
radio, and in newspapers and magazines.
Integrate e-government with the use of
one-stop-shops, call centers, etc.
For many years we will still have citizens who do not have
Internet access or do not want to interact with their governments via the
Internet. For these people – whether as citizens or workers in businesses –
human intermediation in interactions with government is indispensable.
It is important to bring the government closer to the people,
so that people don’t lose valuable time in bureaucratic processes with
government agencies in scattered physical locations. For example, the
Services for Citizens (Serviço de Atendimento ao Cidadão – SAC) is an
integrated system for delivering government services created by the
Government of Bahia state in 1995 to improve public service delivery (see
www.sac.ba.gov.br). SAC one-stop shops bring together, in the same
physical space, various agencies of the federal, state and local
governments, saving citizens both time and money as well as providing a
comfortable environment. There are appropriate areas for waiting and for
services supported by photocopy services, bank branches, photography
services, and the ability to set up appointments in advance. All this takes
place in a pleasant environment with uninterrupted services during an
extended work day.
The civil servants who work in the SACs have access to the
electronic infrastructure of governments via their Intranets and the
Internet. This facilitates the provision of services on the spot. Ideally,
and putting aside the difficulties of organizing such centers, with adequate
technical support and training any government office can become an
integrated service center. A citizen should be able to apply for a job at
the counter for the secretariats that make up the government, find out from
the Transportation Department what fines his vehicle has received, and make
his declaration of exemption form income tax, better known as
“re-registration of the CPF (Personal Tax Certificate)”. All government
agencies, like banking services, should be used to meet demand for the full
range of products of the organization, sometimes quite different in nature.
And, for those services which require the presence of the citizen, the
Center should provide information on the nearest office providing the
service, the fee required, the necessary documents which have to be
presented, and the time within which the service will be performed. It would
be like a service contract between the citizen and the government to
discourage clientelistic practices and to allow the former to control the
quality of services delivered by the latter.
Another form of electronic intermediation without direct use
of the Internet is the call center. Call centers can be physically
integrated with a one-stop-shop. In this case, the operators reply to
questions with the help of computers connected to the government intranet
and the Internet. The call center can receive and return faxes and operate
“chat centers” with individual attention.[x]
The organization that offers a page of services on the Web
should be prepared to reply to the citizen appropriately. For this it is
necessary to invest in a structure and training to allow proper response to
complaints, suggestions, or questions, to provide accurate information on
service provision or – a novelty – on the use of technology and support for
the use of programs, with a view to replying to questions like “how can I do
this download” or “Why does this page give this message?”.
There are various ways of setting up one-stop-shops. Each
agency present on the portal can set up its own, but these separate centers
cannot provide integrated service delivery when more than one agency is
involved, as in the case of setting up a business, for example. It can be
set up to serve various agencies and processes; it can be divided between
various locations, geographically decentralized and integrated through
information and communication technologies, operating using the same
information system. Or, service delivery can be outsourced to private
businesses having the necessary know-how and can use all the alternatives
mentioned.
The SMS (Short Message Services) technology, commonly known
as the “torpedo”, allows democratizing access to electronic public services.
A large part of the low-income population does not have access to a fixed
line phone at home, but does have a mobile (often pre-paid) phone. In
Brazil, there are examples of using cell phones to deliver public services,
such as sending daily market prices for agricultural products in the Supply
Centers (public markets, CEASAs), informing a candidate for employment of
the availability of a job and setting up an interview, or of information on
vehicles obtained from the Department of Transportation (DETRAN).
So that there will be uniform quality in services provided
via the Internet, at the counters of government offices, or by telephone, it
is important that all have access to the same databases for services and
information. This infrastructure, which takes a lot of work to set up, is
the basis for quality services, whatever the means chosen by the citizen to
obtain them.
Encourage computer literacy
Access means social inclusion and has various dimensions: to
technological resources, but also to the skills necessary to use them. For a
citizen to be able to use computers and access the Internet, digital
literacy training is necessary. Many people learn either at school, or with
the help of families and friends, but organized digital literacy programs
are also important. Telecenters (using the term generically) often offer
courses which promote their use.
Programs involving partnerships with private sector firms and
NGOs for installing infrastructure, hardware, software, user support, and
technical support for networks are not sufficient for a community to obtain
information and services and to generate their own content. Beyond training
the “reader citizen”, it is necessary to provide opportunities for the
“producer citizen”, capable of producing content, offering services for the
community, and expanding her space for citizen activity. A State policy for
electronic government should include resources to promote digital literacy
both directly (through public schools or government telecenters) and
indirectly (through incentives for the creation of programs with this
objective by civil society organizations or private sector enterprises.
The Committee for Democracy in Information Technology (CDI),
established in 1995 in Rio de Janeiro, has specialized in digital literacy
through its Information Technology and Citizens Rights Schools (EICs).
According to its website (www.cdi.org.br),
“a recent external impact evaluation showed that 87% of the youths who pass
through the EICs
had their lives modified in some way, whether by going back
to public schools, by obtaining an employment, or by getting them out of
criminal activity.” Some Brazilian states have agreements with CDI to
operate EICs and telecenters (See Box 3.2)
|
Box 3.2: The Committee
for Democracy in Information Technology
What is it?
– The Committee for Democracy in Information Technology is a
non-governmental organization, declared to be of Public Utility by the
Federal Government, which has the mission of promoting social inclusion
using information technology as an instrument for building and
exercising citizenship. It works in low-income communities and with
institutions that serve groups with special needs, like, prisoners,
native peoples, youth at risk, the carriers of physical and mental
deficiencies, and patients undergoing psychiatric treatment, among
others.
Why information technology? –
Information technology is one of the principal driving
forces in contemporary society.
It has
an irrisitible attraction for youth.
Training in information
technology and the learning of elements of citizenship, acquired through
the EICs (Schools for Information Technology and Citizenship) create
more opportunities for youths and at the same time benefit their
families and communities.
How does it work? – CDI invests in the capacity of communities themselves and/or
organizations established in them to carry out socio-educational
undertakings. In highlighting the appropriation of information and
communication technologies, the pedagogical model of the EICs spurs
reorientation of its students’ lives, encouraging them to use the
technology in their own projects, as a tool for discussion, research,
communication and developing local activities. And in discovering that
they are capable of thinking, debating, researching and acting on their
realities, they come to exercise citizenship in the true sense of the
word and to act as agents to transform the society in which they live
The choice of project
pedagogy as a methodology within the historical cultural framework of
Paulo Freire has shown itself to be fundamental and coherent with the
perception that the new technologies can lead to social inclusion. The
projects seek to encourage direct action by students in their
communities. Thus, in addition to contributing to the broadening of
opportunities for jobs and the generation of income, mastering
information technology makes it possible for them to gain access to new
sources of information and social spaces, building social capital.
CDI’s activity seeks
social inclusion using education and information technology as
motivating agents. CDI believes that citizenship comes from the capacity
of individuals to act on the public space so as to institute rights
relating some some particular dimension of community life. And thus it
is a path that is self-constructing.
Where
to they act? -
CDI has
37 Regional Committees in 20 Brazilian states. Internationally there are
already CDIs in Japan, Colombia, Uruguai, Mexico, Chile, South Africa,
Angola, Honduras, Guatamala , and Argentina.
In Brazil there are more
than 700 active, autonomous, and self-sustaining EICs. CDI provides the
EICs with free computers, software, methodology for applying pedagogy
based on the principles of Paulo Freire, systematization of pedagogical
strategies, continuing training of educators from the community itself,
and technical support for management and evaluating social impact. As a
result of CDI’s efforts, 425,220 children and youth have received
training
Who are the partners? –
To develop its projects, CDI is always raising resources through
agreements and partnerships with businesses, philanthropic
organizations, and the public sector. With the support of the National
Economic and Social Development Bank (BNDES), Avina foundation, W. K
Kellog Foundation, Phillips, the Inter-American Development Bank,
Accenture Foundation, Microsoft, Vale do Rio Doce Foundation, Telefônica
Foundation, AMCHAM-SP, Esso, UBS Financial Services, World Bank/InfoDev,
Xerox, and EDS Foundation, among other basic partners, CDI is building a
solid financial and institutional structure, audited annually by Ernst &
Young, which allows new resources to be invested with security for the
creation of high-quality social programs. CDI also promotes permanent
campaigns for the donation of computers and has an active corps of
volunteers. |
|

Learn the story of Leandro Farias of the
Morro dos Macacos in Capítulo 9, Part II.
|
Central functions of the State in delivering services to the
Citizen
We recommend four
priorities for the electronic delivery of services to citizens (G2C):
education and training, public health, justice, and public safety, and one
in the area of services to businesses (G2B): e-procurement (online purchase
of goods and services). These are suggestions for discussion among
governments and in structured contacts with society. We believe that they
are fundamental factors for action by the public sector and can have a large
impact on the welfare of citizens and eventually on income distribution.
Even though they are priority areas for e-government, we are not excluding
continuing the already successful efforts in the area of public finance (in
online declarations of the income tax) and elections, where Brazil has the
best electronic election system in the world. In each of these priority
areas we provide suggestions for actions to take, integrated with other
actions of public policy.
Education and Training
Use of the Internet and
television in classrooms of schools and universities and in distance
education – carried out in homes, workplaces, and specialized centers – is
perhaps the highest priority. These two media can be complementary rather
than substitutes. The Internet offers interactivity, but, without broadband
connectivity, cannot offer the same quality of sound and images as
television, and there is still a long road to travel to reach those who need
education and training to better their lives and to increase the
competitiveness and productivity of the labor force.
This is a sector in
which the principles of building on strengths and integrating can be
applied. We have already mentioned various programs of the Ministry of
Education which are already under way, but which can not only be perfected,
but accelerated. Examples are TV School (TV Escola), ProInfo
(National Program for Information Technology in Schools), Proformação
(Program for Training Practicing Teachers), and the Canal Futura
(a 24-hour-a-day educational channel delivered by satellite and cable) of
the Roberto Marinho Foundation.
UniRede (www.unirede.br),
the virtual public university of Brazil, is a consortium of 70 public higher
education institutions that seeks to democratize access to quality education
through offering distance education courses. The proposal includes
undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education according to the Terms for
Membership which created it. The consortium has already made possible
cooperation between universities and technical schools, thus avoiding the
isolation and duplication of effort among its initiatives. Among other
advances, the payment of royalties for the dissemination of is eliminated
for technologies and content developed by its member institutions.
Furthermore, it delivers a distance education course on the use of
television in schools developed with the support of the Secretariat of
Distance Education of the Ministry of Education.
All the member
institutions have experience in distance education, and for this reason the
virtual university receives the support of the ministries of Education,
Science and Technology and other partners. But, for lack of financial
resources, the achievements of UniRede have been well below its potential.
One of the organizations
participating in UniRede is Cederj, the Center of Distance Education
of Rio de Janeiro State (www.cederj.edu.br),
an initiative of the government of Rio de State in partnershiop with the
public universities and various municipal governments of the state.[xi]
Cederj, which makes this form of democratizing public, free, and quality
higher education viable, has a production center for web materials and for
television and is already offering courses in Mathematics and Biology in the
interior of the state in 26 centers in the interior of the state. These
centers combine broadband internet access using distance education with
conventional education. Students receive printed materials and have access
to web-based materials as well. Their questions can be answered by tutors of
the universities responsible for the courses by telephone, fax, or e-mail.
Each week tutors responsible for each discipline are available in the
regional centers to provide additional help to the students.
The courses are hybrid
ones, partly taught via distance education, partly face-to-face with the
help of the tutors, These courses lead to undergraduate degrees in
Mathematics and Biological Sciences, each eight semesters in length. They
are designed to train secondary school teachers in the hard sciences. There
are not yet enough resources to accelerate the production of new courses,
like Chemistry, Physics, and Computer Science.
We could cite many other
examples, but what is important is to develop a strategy for supporting
distance education in Brazil with the leadership of the Ministry of
Education, in collaboration with state and municipal secretariats of
Education, so as to make a real leap into the future. And the Ministry of
Communication, which controls the Fund for Universalization of
Telecommunications Services (Fust), and the Ministry of Science and
Technology (and the state and municipal science and technology secretariats)
should not be left out: all can contribute to improving the national system
of education and training.
Distance education and
the use of television and the Internet in classrooms should be used not only
formal education, but also – in collaboration with the Ministry of Labor,
the Senai/Senac/Senar/Sebrae System, by the extension departments of public
and private universities, and by private sector training firms. Together
they can constitute a national system for permanent education and training
for those who have left the formal system of education and are either
working or want to work. In economic terms, distance education is not only
for the flow of students in the formal education system, but also for
the much larger stock of the labor force, for intellectual and
workers and laborers who need to stay up-to-date and have possibilities to
increase their knowledge. The objective is to make them competitive in the
labor market and to make the businesses in which they work competitive in
the national and international markets.
Various ministries,
schools, and enterprises of the federal government seek to train their
employees or civil servants of the federal, state, and municipal governments
throughout Brazil. Some examples are the Ministry and the secretariats of
Education, the Ministry and the secretariats of Health, the Ministry of
Social Security, the National School for Public Administration (Enap), the
Financial Administration School, and the Bank of Brazil.
The costs of transport
and living expenses, as well as of the time away from their jobs necessary
for face-to-face training in Brasília or even in the state capitals is high.
Digital distance education techniques offer ways to achieve educational
objectives without incurring the costs associated with travel. But
frequently the fixed costs of (1) creating and maintaining a center in
Brasília with an uplink to one or more satellites and (2) establishing and
maintaining training centers with broadband Internet access and television
in the states and municipalities together prevent the use of this form of
teaching and learning.
The truth is that rarely
does an agency, a school, or a federal enterprise need such centers in the
states and municipalities for a sufficient number of days per year and hours
per day, and for a sufficient number of trainees to justify the needed
investments. However, if it were possible to share the costs and the
training centers with other ministries, schools and enterprises, the unit
cost of training for the full use of installations, if not for 24 hours per
day, perhaps 12 or 8; if not for 365 days a year, at least 250 or 300. This
is the policy being followed in Mexico, where 3,200 Digital Community
Centers in municipal seats and other locations got broadband Internet
connections in June 2003, and the objective is to reach 10,000 locations by
2006 (see
www.e-mexico.gob.mx and
www.sct.gob.mx/prog_sectorial_01_06/pg_capitulo7.html).
In more isolated
municípios with lesser demographic density, especially in the Amazon
region, it is possible that the number of trainees of the agencies and
enterprises of the federal government participating in partnerships of this
nature would still not be sufficient to fully occupy a municipal training
center, which would most likely have to operate using satellite-based
connections to the Internet. In such cases, partnerships should be broadened
to include state secretariats, private businesses, and the third (NGO)
sector with an interest in carrying out distance education programs.
Pooling the demand for
training in order to reach the grass roots at lower unit costs than
face-to-face training requires coordination among agencies and public sector
firms which want to give and receive training. The problem is organizational
and political, not technological.
The economies of scale
inherent in these technologies require full use of the training centers to
be constructed. To achieve effective inter-institutional collaboration,
capable of aggregating the economic and social benefits at the lowest
possible cost, requires clarity of vision and leadership regarding the
benefits to be achieved at the top of the institutions – preferably in key
institutions for command and coordination, like the Casa Civil
(Presidential Chief of Staff), Ministry of Finance, and Ministry of
Planning, Budget, and Management.
When financial resources
for new initiatives are scarce, partnerships seeking to reduce costs become
strategic necessities.
Health
To invest in Brazil’s
human resources education and training are not enough; it is necessary to
maintain and improve the health of Brazilians. Public health is above all
education for the prevention of diseases and accidents and to broaden the
understanding of citizens concerning diseases and the ways in which they can
be cured.
Thus, everything we
write concerning distance education applies to the health system, both
preventative and curative. Health portals on the Web for citizens and for
professionals of the health system can offer up-to-date information on any
topic related to this subject.[xii]
And, in a proactive way, Web campaigns can be developed to prevent diseases
like dengue.
Telemedicine makes
possible diagnosis and treatment management by specialists for patients far
from the large urban centers without the need for travel, which makes for a
much more efficient use of these scares human resources. And the smartcard
(see
www.datasus.gov.br/cartao) for SUS (the Single Health System),
initiated on a pilot basis by the Ministry of Health during the second
government of Fernando Henrique Cardoso and which makes possible access to
personalized data, such as a citizen’s medical records, can be perfected and
rolled out to the full population. Information systems which permit the
citizen or his family to oversee the services which are being delivered
relieve the government of building burdensome oversight structures.
Geographic information
system (GIS) technology can be employed in mapping endemics and epidemics
and monitoring the success of campaigns such as the vaccination of children
and senior citizens. It is also possible to keep track of the number of
vacant beds in public and private hospital, and the availability of beds in
intensive care units, the supply of health services by hospitals and health
centers, the treatment of patients, computerization of transplant centers to
guarantee rapid location of donors and recipients, as well as stocks of
blood, human milk, and bones. To apply information technology to health
allows opening for the population information of a non-individual character;
in this way the costs and successes of policies can be monitored by
citizens.
Public Safety
The public safety crisis
has become one of the deepest concerns of Brazilians living in Rio de
Janeiro, São Paulo, Campinas, Santo André, Belo Horizonte – and the list
continues. Kidnappings, assassinations of mayors and judges, common citizens
killed by stray bullets, summary executions by bandits and by police, entire
city districts ruled by drug traders – every day citizens are assaulted by
headlines, shocked by television coverage, and terrified by the violence
shown in films like City of God and Bus Number 174. This
crisis affects the life of everyone and also the economy, the tourism
industry – which, despite low prices in dollars and euros, has been
suffering significant losses because of violence – and high-technology
industry and services; there is a brain drain as scientists and technicians
who fear daily violence and seek safer places to work. This fear also
reaches smaller cities, since it is a daily theme in the media.
The public safety
problem is related to Brazil’s legendary and unjust income distribution, to
the slow rate of generation of new jobs compared to the rapid growth of the
labor force, to drug dealing, and to the multiple police forces (civil,
military, federal, highway, municipal guards, and private security guards),
to cite only the most evident causes. Using telematics alone cannot resolve
all these problems, but it could be an important part of the solution. In
the paragraphs that follow some examples of how this can be done are
provided.
Crime mapping using GIS
Geographic information
systems (GIS) already play an important role in crime mapping in several
Brazilian cities – Belo Horizonte, in Minas Gerais, was the first to
implement them. Connected with modern offices (delegacias), they make
it possible to classify crimes according to their location (with the street
and number identified), the time the crime occurred, whether arms were used,
whether drugs were involved, etc. Computerized and applied in maps on
electronic screens in dispatching rooms and in police cars, this technique
helps police officers discover patterns of crime and to dispatch the police
available according to a strategy. If physical maps are combined with maps
showing demographic and socio-economic data, this tool can become even more
powerful and can help not only in repressing crime, but also in preventing
it.[xiii]
Linking electronic
databases
Police work in Brazil
still lacks full access to relevant information coming from a variety of
databases at the federal, state and municipal levels. With national data
banks of fingerprints, photographs of known criminals, police files, and
other relevant data available in all police offices and even in police cars,
police in any part of the country would have a powerful instrument to
identify suspects. The interconnecting of Brazilian databases useful for
police work is far from complete (see Box 3.3).
|
Box
3.3: The National System of Information for Justice and Security (INFOSEG)
With the high mobility of criminals in a
country of huge dimensions, the police and justice authorities have
always found it difficult to verify and identify an individual’s legal
situation. The difficulties were various: how to know if a person is a
fugitive? How can a judge know whether a person has a previous
conviction, in order to adjust his sentence or require an individual to
be jailed during a trial? How to know if a “good citizen” who appears at
a police office isn’t the subject of legal processes under way in other
states? In addition to people, it is difficult to determine if some
objects of particular interest to the police have a particular legal
status: how can a police officer know whether a truck on a road in the
interior of Maranhão state was stolen in another state? Or know if a
suspicious firearm was used in a crime in another state? And how to
verify if the driver’s license is valid?
Since 1977, with the implementation of
INFOSEG, this kind of information is entered into a system run by the
Ministry of Justice. This system contains basic information on
individuals (name, parents, place of birth, nicknames, identity card
number, address) and the individual’s status in the judicial system
(condemned, fugitive, with an arrest warrant) and with regards to the
police (is the subject of a police investigation) and shares information
with other systems like the national register of motor vehicles (Renavam),
the national registry of drivers licenses (Renach), and the registry of
firearms, including stolen firearms, in the Federal Police’s national
registry of firearms (Sinarm).
INFOSEG works through an Intranet linking
Brasília with each state secretariat of public safety. Access to the
system is controlled through passwords and is for people certified to
use it. A police officer in the street or on the road can request
information by radio from the operations center, which can then query
INFOSEG. Entities in the justice system can have access to INFOSEG
through the state secretariats of public safety which generally have
routine procedures to facilitate this access.
INFOSEG depends largely on the training
and will of authorities in each state to place up-to-date information in
the system. It is hoped, in the near future, that the system will have
available photographs of criminals sought in each state and also have a
file of information and photographs of missing persons. It is also hoped
that the system can offer some basic intelligence information (typical
modes of operation of a criminal, links with other criminals and groups,
etc.), at leas for criminals most linked to organized crime, the most
active ones, and the most dangerous ones.
Some information on
public safety at the national level can also be viewed at the Ministry
of Justice’s website. On the page
www.mj.gov.br/senasp/default.htm
information can be obtained on crime indicators and data about the
police of each state, in addition to information on activities of the
Federal Government in the area of public safety.
To learn more about
e-public safety, see Chapter 7. |
Observation
with TV cameras and digital identification of criminals
In places with serious
urban violence and posing a high risk to the population, sophisticated
electronic surveillance systems can be used. Automatic cameras are already
used to identify automobiles which break traffic laws, and automatic
television cameras linked by fiber optic cables with military police command
centers are beginning to appear. In this area new kinds of partnerships are
being developed. In Rio de Janeiro, for example, Globo Cable has allowed its
network of fiber optic cable to be used free of charge to connect 12 TV
cameras along the beaches, from Leme to Leblon, to the Military Police
command center.
Electronic surveillance
can prevent crime, once potential criminals know that they are being
watched, and can be used to identify criminals in action, resulting in their
capture. Partnerships with the private sector, not only in
telecommunications, but also in commerce, the hotel industry, etc, can
supplement tax resources to install and operate such systems. A more
sophisticated form of electronic surveillance is the capture of images of
people passing in front of surveillance cameras and their automatic
comparison with images of known criminals in a database. This system has
been used as an anti-terrorist measure in London and other cities and
high-risk areas, such as banks and the headquarters of large companies.
This is a controversial
area, and implementation of such surveillance systems should be discussed
with society with a view to weighing the possible benefits against the risks
of reduced privacy.
Another approach to
identification of criminals online was developed in Rondônia and could be
adapted in the rest of Brazil’s states.[xiv]
War on drug-dealing and
organized crime
The production, transport, trade, and consumption of drugs
are matters of national and international public safety. The networks and
mafias involved in the drug trade are powerful, international, and have
access to finance, intelligence, and arms many times superior to those of
government authorities. This is a question of war, since the very structure
and integrity of society are threatened, frontiers penetrated, and
sovereignty lost. The losses are economic, social, moral and of health. In
this war the powerful weapons of telematics should be employed to defend
society. The techniques described above are all applicable. Others, like
radar, satellite, and geophysical surveillance (like the Service for
Protection of the Amazon – Sivam) can and should be employed.
Integration with other
public policies
The repression of crime
is an area where the potential for applying technology is more evident,
given the perception of insecurity of the population in large urban centers.
Less evident, but with more effective results, is its use as a support for
integrated projects of various areas of government, which can lead to
reduction in crime indicators. The technology can be the supporting
infrastructure for integrated policies for education, sport, leisure,
culture, community work, income and employment generation, and support for
small individual and community enterprises.
Online government purchases (e-procurement)
Today portals for online
purchases over the Internet, like ComprasNet (the federal e-procurement
service), insure more transparency in bidding for government projects,
permit monitoring by civil society and citizens, and reduce opportunities
for corruption. The change[xv]
in Law 8,666, which deals with bids, should make government purchases more
agile.
Without a doubt, it is
necessary to update bidding instruments, the so-called new regimes for
electronic commerce and government. However, it is not enough to change Law
no. 8,666; it is necessary to create a broader legal basis for the digital
economy, such as questions relating to privacy rights, the public key
infrastructure (for encryption), for digital signatures, for time-stamping.
Various steps are being taken in the right direction. Wed could have a
permanent government structure, as in other countries, to deal full time
with this new economic environment.
The federal government’s
e-procurement portal is a world-class solution as testified by technicians
from the European Community. Furthermore, its implementation was an
innovative experience in terms of the business model, since the solution was
the fruit of a public-private partnership: all the investment was carried
out by private enterprise and the income from the portal will be divided
between the government and the private partner.[xvi]
Various changes should
be made to increase security, transparency and agility of public sector
transactions. The Internet is a privileged medium for purchasing faster and
at a lower price, and it also allows citizens to monitor the transactions.
Furthermore, the citizen and businesses that use public services need legal
guarantees that they protect them from eventual failures of the systems.
Judicial reform
The judiciary should
increase its use of information and communications technology, principally
regarding legal and constitutional reforms, in order to make the whole
judicial cycle more efficient. The experience of Rio Grande do Sul shows the
way in this area, as does that of São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul.[xvii]
Justice in Brazil tends to be delayed, and often is not carried out, which
frustrates the population and increases the custo Brasil (cost of
doing business in Brazil), reducing our competitiveness in world markets.

[i]
United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration
and American Society for Public Administration (2001) and Accenture
(2002).
[ii]
There are already attempts at integration, for example in Rio Grande do
Sul, in which state and municipal agencies succeeded in physically
integrating and in a single office all the agencies involved in setting
up a new business. In São Paulo the same thing happened, with projects
integrating registries at the state and federal level.
[iii]
Fernandes and Afonso, 2001, p. 25.
[iv]
Regarding portals, see in chapter 6, “Managing health information:
seeking to promote citizenship”, and in Chapter 10, “Designing portals”.
[viii]
This segment is based on Peter T. Knight, “Reforma administrativa”,
Banco Hoje 150 (September 2001), p. 28.
[ix]
L.C.A Oliveira, M.A.V.C. Cunha e H.P. Santos Filho, “A tecnologia da
informação na relação entre o Estado e o cidadão: a expectativa dos
excluídos digitais num estudo de caso no Estado do Paraná” in Enapad-27.
Encontro da Anpad, Atibaia, 2003.
[xi]
See, in Chapter 5, the text of Carlos Eduardo Bielchowski, Coordinator
of Cederj.
[xii]
See, in Chapter 6, the discussion of the federal government’s health
portal and the Brazilian virtual hospital.
[xiii]
See, in Chapter 7, the text on crime-mapping in Pernambuco.
[xiv]
See, in Chapter 7, the text on online identification of criminals in
Rondônia.
[xv]
Proposal built on the base of a government text and on public
consultations.
[xvi]
Chapter 8 deals with Brazilian experience with government e-procurement.
[xvii]
See, in chapter 7, the experience of Rio Grande do Sul and also, in Chapter 8, the Federal Social Court of the 3rd
Region, (Fórum Social Juizado da Justiça Federal) headquartered in
São Paulo, with
jurisdiction over São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul).
|
| |
|